I tend to skip any of these products when they come up in peer review because I dont know how I'm supposed to be rating them.
I was under the impression thatanydepiction the nipple was AP, but I keep seeing people submitting them (and even getting to the front pages of the catalog in sales) with visible nipples showing through a shirt as GA.
Note, I'm talking about only the texture having the nipple, the mesh itself does not have any physical indications (such as sticking up in those areas). I'm aware those are AP. I'm talking about purely drawn on nipple shadows. See below.
Are we to allow these to pass as GA, or what would we mark them as if not?
They do cover the mcg (as shown above, i am wearing the mcg skin) but the nipples are implied as visible with the shading.
0 Votes
16 Comments
Sorted by
C
Communityposted
5 months ago
Admin
Posted by “LestatDeLioncourt” on May 10, 2023.
[Archived]
Hi @Parcel I my opinion, this should be AP. It is probably a "roll-of-the-dice". Many times the product is okay as GA and once in a while it would be re-rate it as AP.
The actual "Virtual Good Policy" says the following.
Nudity (APO) - Virtual goods depicting full or partial nudity, including but not limited to nude humans, nude avatars, skins, and/or products (transparent or otherwise) that cover less than the GA minimum coverage guidelines below. Depiction of uncovered female breasts and un-aroused male or female genitals are considered part of this category. Products that may meet the minimum coverage guidelines but due to enhancements/enlargements of avatar bodies and parts project the sense of nudity fall under this category as well.
If it makes the viewer have the "Sense" of Nudity, (my opinion) is it should be AP. This not the opinion of most items like this in the catalog.
0 Votes
People who like this
Delete Comment
This post will be deleted permanently. Are you sure?
Edit Comment
Edit Topic
Delete Comment
This post will be deleted permanently. Are you sure?
Posted by “Parcel” on May 08, 2023.
[Archived]I tend to skip any of these products when they come up in peer review because I dont know how I'm supposed to be rating them.
I was under the impression that any depiction the nipple was AP, but I keep seeing people submitting them (and even getting to the front pages of the catalog in sales) with visible nipples showing through a shirt as GA.
Note, I'm talking about only the texture having the nipple, the mesh itself does not have any physical indications (such as sticking up in those areas). I'm aware those are AP. I'm talking about purely drawn on nipple shadows. See below.![example of what i mean]()
Are we to allow these to pass as GA, or what would we mark them as if not?
They do cover the mcg (as shown above, i am wearing the mcg skin) but the nipples are implied as visible with the shading.
0 Votes
16 Comments
Community posted 5 months ago Admin
Posted by “LestatDeLioncourt” on May 10, 2023.
[Archived]Hi @Parcel I my opinion, this should be AP. It is probably a "roll-of-the-dice". Many times the product is okay as GA and once in a while it would be re-rate it as AP.
The actual "Virtual Good Policy" says the following.
Nudity (APO) - Virtual goods depicting full or partial nudity, including but not limited to nude humans, nude avatars, skins, and/or products (transparent or otherwise) that cover less than the GA minimum coverage guidelines below. Depiction of uncovered female breasts and un-aroused male or female genitals are considered part of this category. Products that may meet the minimum coverage guidelines but due to enhancements/enlargements of avatar bodies and parts project the sense of nudity fall under this category as well.
If it makes the viewer have the "Sense" of Nudity, (my opinion) is it should be AP. This not the opinion of most items like this in the catalog.
0 Votes