In many cases I believe IMVU reacts too fast and not even putting many things into consideration at all and whenever you ask them to kindly point out directly and specifically what exactly was it that was found inappropriate or even which product to prevent further complications in the future you're left in the dark because at most what they do is just simply tell you to read Terms & Policy and that's it. I was recently disabled and returned but left unanswered regarding the matter. They did said they found inappropriate content within my room so my initial thought regarding that instantly is "Okay so if you found inappropriate content within my room yet that all remains the moment I return back to that specific room the exact same with literally 0 changes whatsoever why not address that instead to the creator of that specific product instead of disabling me directly?" It's not like I'm the creator of that product exactly which is why it makes no sense addressing it to me like that. It should instead if it is in fact found inappropriate addressed to the one who created that product in the first place,meaning going straight to the source of the product,because if not then the product will remain within the store regardless and someone else will be getting the same exact outcome because issues like this are never addressed directly to where it originated from.
In many cases I believe IMVU reacts too fast and not even putting many things into consideration at all and whenever you ask them to kindly point out directly and specifically what exactly was it that was found inappropriate or even which product to prevent further complications in the future you're left in the dark because at most what they do is just simply tell you to read Terms & Policy and that's it. I was recently disabled and returned but left unanswered regarding the matter. They did said they found inappropriate content within my room so my initial thought regarding that instantly is "Okay so if you found inappropriate content within my room yet that all remains the moment I return back to that specific room the exact same with literally 0 changes whatsoever why not address that instead to the creator of that specific product instead of disabling me directly?" It's not like I'm the creator of that product exactly which is why it makes no sense addressing it to me like that. It should instead if it is in fact found inappropriate addressed to the one who created that product in the first place,meaning going straight to the source of the product,because if not then the product will remain within the store regardless and someone else will be getting the same exact outcome because issues like this are never addressed directly to where it originated from.
0 Votes
0 Comments
Login to post a comment